Wood, whose role was to develop the ‘horse and rider shape’ survey and incorporate it into the model, added that designers were uncertain which forces devices should be tested that would resemble a horse having a rotational fall. She said: “What our model did was identify the physics, forces, and directions that caused the falls in different situations.”
Many older testing models were representative of maybe one horse size, speed, or jumping distance, whereas the new survey represents different sizes, areas of forearm contact, or jumping speeds, she explained. “Our model provides a clear, full view of rotational falls.”
Forearm contact was previously identified as the critical contact area in rotational falls, and is defined as when the horse’s upper foreleg hits the jump. For those interested in participating, Shannon Wood’s survey can be found here.

Smith emphasised the importance of studying rotational falls because they’re a “high-risk situation,” and the rarity, pointing out that information on them is scarce. FEI statistics show there were just 36 rotational falls throughout all of 2017.
Smith believes prevention and mitigation are key to risk reduction, and that Eventing has done much in both areas: improved course design, better personal safety equipment and new safety devices all help to reduce risk.
“Any reduction in reaction between the fence and horse lowers the risk of a rotational fall,” said Smith.
“If friction is reduced, if a frangible device is incorporated, if the surface is slippery so there’s less force interaction, if the geometry is good, anything reducing that interaction, helps.
“The simulation showed for one speed that 64.2% of forearm contact scenarios were ‘pass’ scenarios where the jump was cleared, 34.6% resulted in rotational falls, and 1.2% were ‘irrecoverable.’
“However, the simulation showed many rotational falls can be turned into ‘pass’ scenarios through improved safety devices or better course design.”